Dòng tin
Tất cả
Giới hạn điểm A ở Harvard mâu thuẫn với triết lý giáo dục hỗ trợ toàn bộ học sinh
Harvard University just voted to limit the number of A grades given in undergraduate classes to about 20% of the class. I’m not in favor of this. It deeply runs counter to how I believe education should be. We should hold a high bar, but also work mightily to support the success of 100% of learners, rather than a fraction.
Harvard’s administration took this step — over the objections of a large fraction of the student body — to counter grade inflation. Grade inflation is real: Many universities have been awarding A and B grades to ever larger fractions of students, and this has caused grade point averages (GPAs) to become less useful as signals of student skill. At the same time, we want students to succeed. The heart of the question is the role of educational institutions. Should our goal be:
- To help students succeed?
- To judge students?
Both of these have value. But my focus when working in education is almost entirely helping students succeed.
To me, it is clear that many people want to learn, to be empowered, to build skills that let them do new things! This is what we focus on at DeepLearningAI. This philosophy is also why my online courses (going back to my early online Stanford courses on Coursera) permitted an unlimited number of retries for graded assignments.
I believe in letting — and even encouraging — someone to redo something until they succeed. This is as opposed to standing in judgement of the fact they didn’t get it right the first time. Further, I want homework assignments to be designed primarily to help people practice and learn, rather than to judge their skill level. This is why I prefer to create “Practice Problems” and “Practice Labs” — questions that, when you think through them, help you to gain practice and reinforce what you know. As opposed to “Assessment Problems” designed primarily to judge skill.
But won’t Harvard’s move make GPAs more meaningful and help prospective employers identify strong candidates? Having hired a large number of people from Harvard and other institutions, I can say confidently that GPA is not an important signal. We have screening and interviewing processes that give far more accurate ways to figure out if someone is truly skilled. I do not need a wider spread in applicant GPA scores to figure out who's really good!
To be clear, there is also value in assessment. Even though standardized testing is much hated, high-quality tests like the SAT, ACT, GRE, TOEFL, etc. provide objective measures of ability in a domain. I find that most people want to learn and succeed. There are also people who want rigorous assessment (for example, to apply for school admissions), but this is a lesser need, and is not my focus when building educational products.
Harvard is often described as an “elite” educational institution. There are two ways to be elite: One option involves limiting enrollments, and then even among admitted students, cap the number of people that do well at 20%. I would rather pursue a different path: Set a high bar and teach elite, cutting-edge skills, but strive relentlessly to help everyone succeed. This way, eliteness is defined not by excluding people but by helping as many people as possible to be excellent.
[Original text: The Batch newsletter]
- ›Harvard hạn chế điểm A cho sinh viên độc lập xuống ~20% để chống lạm phát điểm số.
Coursera và Udemy hợp nhất thành một công ty duy nhất
I'm delighted that @coursera and @udemy have come together as one company to serve learners.
Both Coursera and Udemy were founded with the belief that access to high-quality education changes lives. Over the years, both companies have advanced this goal, creating opportunities for individuals, organizations, and communities around the world.
That role is even more important now, as AI is changing the nature of work and increasing the need for continuous learning. Helping people build job-relevant skills will be critical to how we create a better world.
By combining the strengths of both companies, we can better serve this need. We bring together a broader range of learning content, trusted instructors and educators, and engaging learning experiences. This creates new opportunities to make learning more personalized, more applied, and more accessible at scale.
I’m excited to serve as Chairman of the combined company, working alongside Greg Hart and the leadership team. There is a strong foundation in both organizations, and I look forward to what the teams will build together to expand access opportunity globally.
Learn more: http://blog.coursera.org/coursera-and-udemy-are-now-one-company-creating-the-worlds-most-comprehensive-skills-platform/
- ›Coursera và Udemy hợp nhất để tạo nền tảng kỹ năng toàn diện nhất, kết hợp nội dung học rộng, hướng dẫn đáng tin cậy, và trải nghiệm hấp dẫn.
Cách Sử Dụng AI Cho Nghệ Thuật Đọc Kỹ Lưỡng Cổ Xưa
How To Use AI for the Ancient Art of Close Reading
- ›Close reading là kỹ thuật phân tích cẩn thận văn bản, chú ý đến ngôn ngữ, cấu trúc và nội dung chính xác.
- ›Đây là một công nghệ cổ xưa và mạnh mẽ nhất của nền văn minh để truyền đạt sự hiểu biết toàn diện (gestalt).
- ›AI có thể hỗ trợ áp dụng close reading hiệu quả hơn cho phân tích sâu sắc.